The Summer 2005 Tax
Client Newsletter brings you up-to-date on a number of important tax
law changes for 2005. As a result of tax legislation over the past
few years, there are a number of significant tax law changes
affecting you this year and right now.
You may be aware
through media attention that many of the important tax law changes
are scheduled to “sunset” (go away) at various dates – some sooner
rather than later. You should think of the “sunset” issue as a
future concern and take advantage of the opportunities available to
you now.
The focus in
Washington these days is on Social Security Reform. Congress, it
appears, has placed tax law legislation on the post-Labor Day
agenda. Only time will tell what, if any, tax law changes will be
enacted in 2005. If you recall, this is exactly what happened last
year and in the Fall of 2004, Congress passed and President Bush
signed into law two significant pieces of tax legislation: The
Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 and the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004.
If you have any
questions concerning any of the information being reported on in
this issue of the Tax Client Newsletter, please contact me.
2004 Tax
Legislation
The 2004 Tax Acts (721 pages and 755 amendments to the
Internal Revenue Code) affects a significant number of taxpayers and
in a number of ways. In this issue of the Tax Client Newsletter we
will review some of the most important changes for 2005.
The
Definition of a “Qualifying” Child:
Child-related tax
benefits frequently depend on the existence of a “qualifying” child.
Among the items impacted by the definition are: is the taxpayer
entitled to a dependency exemption, head-of-household filing status,
the child tax credit, the earned income tax credit, or the dependent
care credit? Prior to the 2004 tax legislation, each of the above
items came with its own definition of a “qualifying” child. Talk
about confusion.
Beginning in 2005,
one set of dependency tests applies to the taxpayer’s “qualifying”
children and another test will be used for “qualifying” relatives.
To be a “qualifying” child and eligible for the dependency
exemption, the child:
1. Must be
under the age of 19 at the end of the year or a full-time
student under age 24,
2. Must share a
home with the taxpayer for more than half the year,
3. Must not
provide more than half of his/her own support and
4. Must be the
taxpayer’s child, grandchild, brother, sister, niece or nephew.
Under a new,
uniform definition of a child, a taxpayer’s children include the
taxpayer’s natural children, stepchildren, adopted children and
eligible foster children. This new, uniform definition will be used
for other child-related tax benefits.
Alert: If a child
satisfies the test for more than one taxpayer there are rules in
place that favor parents first. This issue can become tricky and we
are available to work you through this.
Child Tax
Credit Increase is Extended:
The child tax
credit which was scheduled to decrease to $700 in 2005 will stay at
$1,000 per child through 2010. Keep in mind that the available child
tax credit is reduced (and in some cases eliminated altogether) if
the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income is greater than
certain amounts. Note that the new, uniform definition of a child
(see above) did not increase the age at which the child tax credit
is available. The child tax credit is only available for children
under the age of 17 at the end of the tax year.
Tax Brackets
Reduced
One of the most
significant features of the recent tax law changes was the lowering
of income tax brackets. The 2001 Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act provided that individual marginal tax rates
gradually decline over several years. The Jobs and Growth Tax
Reconciliation Act of 2003 accelerated the reductions.
The new tax rates/brackets are:
Now
Was
35% 38.6%
33% 35%
28% 30%
25% 27%
15% 15% (no change)
10% 10% (no change)
Note: Rates were
retroactive to January 1, 2003.
10% Tax
Bracket Increased and Extended:
Both single
taxpayers and joint filers will benefit from an extension of the 10%
tax bracket. For tax years through 2010, the 10% tax bracket applies
to the first $7,000 of taxable income (single filers) and the first
$14,000 (married joint filers). The 10% tax bracket amounts are
adjusted for inflation (started in 2003). Under the old law, the
amounts would have been adjusted for inflation only in 2004, 2009
and 2010.
For 2005, the 10%
tax bracket applies to the first $7,300 of taxable income for single
taxpayers (also for married taxpayers filing separate) and $14,600
for married taxpayers filing jointly.
Marriage
Penalty Relief Extended:
The 2003 Act changed
the so-called “marriage penalty” rules of the tax code. The marriage
penalty is a feature of the tax code that, in some cases, leaves two
working spouses worse off taxwise than they would be as singles. The
marriage penalty comes about because some features of the tax laws
don’t always double for married couples.
The 2004 Act
extends the 2003 marriage penalty relief by continuing to increase
the standard deduction available to married couples to twice the
standard deduction available to single taxpayers. The 2004 Act
extends this relief through 2010.
The 2003 Act
expanded the 15% tax bracket for married couples filing jointly to
double that of single taxpayers. The 2004 Act extends this relief
through 2010.
Lower Capital
Gains Rates
Investors came out
a very big winner under the 2003 Act. The top capital gains rate was
lowered from 20% to 15%. The lowest capital gains rate decreased to
5% from 10%. Note that the lower rates were effective for
transactions after May 5, 2003. The lower rates are scheduled
to expire after 2008.
Taxpayers in the
lowest two brackets (10% and 15%) will get a one-year bonus in 2008
when they will pay no federal taxes on capital gains. The tax is
reinstated after 2008.
Dividends
Taxed at 15%
Historically,
dividend income was taxed as ordinary income. Under the 2003 Act,
the top dividend rate was lowered to 15%. Taxpayers in the lowest
two tax brackets pay 5%. This is a very significant change when you
consider the fact that the top rate for dividends was 38.6%. The
new lower rates are effective for qualified dividends received
after December 31, 2002. The reduced rates are the same rates
that apply to capital gains.
With up to a 20
percentage point difference between the highest income tax rate
(35%) and the highest dividend rate (15%), determining what a
“qualifying” dividend is can make a big difference. To be a
“qualified” dividend, the stock must be held for more than 60 days
during a 120 day period starting 60 days before the ex-dividend
date. If this sounds complicated – it is. Many companies have
experienced difficulty in properly reporting this information to
their shareholders. The lower rates are scheduled to expire after
2008.
Out of favor for
years, dividends on stock have surged back. The 2003 dividend-tax
cut has prompted companies to pay out an increasing share of their
profits rather than stash the cash or reinvest it. Some companies,
notably Microsoft, have started paying dividends for the first time.
In 2004, U.S. companies paid out a record $181 billion in dividends.
Taxpayers in the
lowest two brackets will get a one-year bonus in 2008 when they will
pay no tax on dividend income. The tax is reinstated after
2008.
Electric
Vehicle Credit and Clean Fuels Tax Deduction
Taxpayers, who
purchase a “qualified electric vehicle” in 2004 or 2005, are allowed
a nonrefundable tax credit for 10% of the costs. The maximum tax
credit is $4,000. Note that for vehicles placed in service in 2006,
the amount of the allowed credit is reduced by 75% and then
eliminated for vehicles placed in service after 2006.
Taxpayers who
purchase a “qualified clean-fuel vehicle” in 2004 or 2005 are
eligible for a deduction of up to $2,000. For clean-fuel vehicles
placed in service in 2006, the deduction will be reduced by 75% and
then eliminated for vehicles placed in service after 2006.
The IRS is, on an
ongoing basis, “certifying” vehicles. The most recent vehicle
“certified” is the 2006 Toyota Highlander hybrid. Please be sure
that the vehicle “qualifies” before making the purchase.
State Sales
Tax Deduction:
One of the most
exciting developments (maybe not for all taxpayers) in the 2004 Jobs
Act was a provision to allow taxpayers to deduct state and local
sales taxes in place of (not in addition to) state and local income
taxes. This election is available for tax years 2004 and 2005. This
new deduction is most popular among taxpayers from states (there are
nine) that do not have a state income tax.
Taxpayers who elect
to deduct state and local sales taxes have two options for
determining the deductible amount. Taxpayers may deduct the actual
amount of taxes paid (keep those receipts) or they may deduct
the appropriate amount from tables provided by the IRS.
If you pay state
income tax, the chances are you’ll come out ahead with the state
income tax deduction. But there are exceptions. Big spenders should
run the numbers. So should residents of states, including Illinois
and Michigan, where income tax rates are lower than the state sales
tax rate.
Alert: The
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) may eliminate any benefit provided by
the new sales tax deduction.
States With
No Income Tax:
Alaska
Florida
Nevada
*New Hampshire
South Dakota
*Tennessee
Texas
Washington
Wyoming
*New Hampshire and
Tennessee have a state income tax limited to interest and dividends.
States With No
Sales Tax:
*Alaska
Delaware
Montana
New Hampshire
Oregon
*There are some
local jurisdictions in Alaska that impose a local sales tax.
Charitable
Contributions of Cars and Other Vehicles:
Concerned that too
many taxpayers were taking much larger tax deductions for donated
automobiles than the amount the charities were receiving when the
cars were sold at auction, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
enacted some major changes to the rules effective January 1, 2005.
Under the 2004 Act,
the general rule is that the amount of the deduction for the
contribution of an automobile, boat or aircraft valued at more than
$500 is limited to the gross sales proceeds obtain by the
charity when the vehicle is sold.
The 2004 Act
provides for two circumstances in which the old (you get to deduct
the fair market value) rules would apply: (1) the charity keeps the
vehicle or (2) the charity makes significant improvements to the
vehicle before selling it.
On June 3, 2005,
the IRS issued some guidance (Notice 2005-44) on how the new law
will be applied. The Notice says that the new gross proceeds limits
on fair market value hold that if the fair market value is less than
the amount obtained by the charity, the donor is still to use the
fair market value. The Notice also says that if a charity donates
the vehicle or sells it at a nominal price in furtherance of its
charitable purposes, the taxpayer can rely on the fair market value.
Here’s the bottom
line. If you are thinking of donating a vehicle - do not believe
everything that is being advertised. Call me to make sure you
understand any limits you are facing and whether there are any
alternatives available to you.
The IRS expects to
bring in $2.4 billion in extra tax revenue over the next ten years
as a result of the new limits placed on vehicle donations.
Educator’s
Deduction:
Educators can
deduct (above-the-line) up to $250 of qualified out-of-pocket
expenses paid in 2005. If both spouses are eligible educators and a
joint tax return is filed, each may deduct up to $250. Eligible
“educators” include teachers of K-12, counselors, principals, and
aides in a school who work at least 900 hours during the school
year.
“Qualified”
expenses include ordinary and necessary expenses paid in connection
with books, supplies, equipment (this includes computer equipment,
software and services), and other materials used in the classroom.
Expenses for home
schooling are not eligible for the deduction.
This deduction is
scheduled to expire after 2005.
Tuition and
Fees Deduction:
An above-the-line
deduction is available to taxpayers for “qualified” tuition and
related expenses paid for the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or
the taxpayer’s dependent. The amount that can be deducted is limited
depending on adjusted gross income. While the maximum deduction for
2005 is $4,000, there are some taxpayers (not eligible for the
$4,000 based on their income) who may qualify for a $2,000
deduction.
This very popular
deduction is scheduled to expire after 2005.
Alert: If Congress
doesn’t extend this tax deduction beyond 2005, it might make sense
for some taxpayers to consider paying for the first term of 2006 by
December 31, 2005. In some cases this action would result in a tax
deduction for 2005. As always, check with my office before you make
any “advance” payments.
AMT:
Here’s one topic
that we would all love to forget about. The Alternative Minimum Tax
(AMT) is designed to prevent high-income taxpayers from avoiding
significant tax liability. A taxpayer’s AMT for a tax year is the
excess of the tentative minimum tax over the regular tax. All
taxpayers subject to the regular income tax system are also subject
to the AMT system. The number of taxpayers exposed to the AMT is
rapidly increasing. The AMT is projected to affect about 3.8 million
taxpayers in 2005 and more than 20 million by 2006. It appears that
the government’s definition of a “high-income taxpayer” is expanding
like a balloon.
Taxpayers subject
to the AMT will be happy to know that the 2004 Act extends the
higher AMT exemptions through 2005. The exemptions are:
$58,000 for
married taxpayers filing jointly and for surviving spouses
$40,250 for
single taxpayers
$29,000 for
married taxpayers filing jointly
Unless Congress
acts to extend the higher AMT exemptions, the amounts will revert to
those that applied in the 2000 tax year ($45,000, $33,750 and $2,250
respectively).
Health
Savings Accounts
One of the most
significant tax law changes for 2004 was the introduction of Health
Savings Accounts (HSAs). The HSAs were created in the Medicare
Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.
Effective January 1, 2004, HSAs allow deductible contributions to be
set aside to cover medical expenses that are not covered by a
high-deductible medical plan in which the taxpayer-employee
participates.
HSAs allow
taxpayers to save and pay part of their medical expenses with
tax-advantaged money. The funds that taxpayers put into the accounts
may grow and be used tax-free for qualified medical expenses. The
accounts can be opened only in tandem with an HSA-qualified
insurance policy that has a high deductible – in 2005, at least
$1,000 for single coverage or $2,000 for family coverage.
The contributor to
the HSA – either the employee of the employer – gets a tax deduction
for the contributions going into the HSA, and then the employee is
allowed to withdraw the funds tax-free in the same year or in a
future year to cover their unreimbursed medical expenses.
Contributions that are not used in any tax year may be rolled over
for future use. Upon reaching the age of 65, accumulated funds in an
HSA can be withdrawn tax-free to cover medical expenses or they can
be withdrawn penalty-free (but not tax-free) for any purpose.
If you have any
question regarding whether a Health Savings Account is right for you
and or your family – please contact my office to schedule an
appointment.
Conclusion:
The American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004 represents the biggest single piece of
tax legislation since the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. When
combined with the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004,
taxpayers are left with a significant number of tax law changes. In
the Summer 2005 Tax Client Newsletter we have reviewed many of the
most significant tax law changes affecting you now.
As always your
individual focus should be on how the tax law changes affect you and
how the tax law changes benefit you. Please contact me if I can
help.
|